The right not to reveal journalistic sources
The protection of journalistic sources is one of the key rights that journalists have in order to exercise their freedom of expression and to fulfil their function as a ‘’public watchdog”.
Without such protection, journalists’ sources may refrain from helping them to fulfil their function. Journalists have this right regardless of whether their sources obtained the information legally or illegally.
The right not to reveal their sources protects journalists not only from specific orders to reveal the name of the source, but also from actions by the police or some other public authority which could lead to the identification of the source.
example The police cannot order a journalist to provide documents containing a lead to the identification of the source, listen in on a journalist’s phone conversations or search his/her house and data storage devices.
However, the secrecy of journalistic sources is not absolute and can be restricted in exceptional circumstances:
A journalist may be required to reveal his/her sources only in exceptional circumstances, if it is needed to protect a vital interest. For example, the need to identify the person source who leaked a company’s confidential corporate plan or information in a highly sensitive criminal case, would not automatically be considered to be in the overriding public interest, justifying the disclosure of journalistic sources.
Any interference with the secrecy of a journalist’s sources must be treated with utmost caution. There should be adequate legal safeguards to prevent the authorities from abusing such exceptions.
During criminal proceedings the prosecutor’s office can request persons processing information for journalistic purposes to disclose that information based on a ruled of a preliminary investigation judge or court ruling after careful consideration of all involved interests. In making his/her decision the judge should consider such factors as:
- Whether the information required is related to a serious crime, that is punishable by at least 8 years of imprisonment, and giving out the source information is in the interests of the public
- Whether there are no other ways (sources) to discover the perpetrator
The judge, in his/her decision, must explain why an interest in discovering the source of information overrides the journalist’s freedom of expression and secrecy of their sources.
How to complain
If you consider that the preliminary investigation judge’s or the judge’s order to disclose a source is disproportional and does not balance all involved interests, you should file an appeal with the prosecutor’s office or the Office of the Prosecutor General if the order has been given before a statement of charges had been prepared. The prosecutor’s office or the Office of Prosecutor General should review the appeal within 30 days from its receipt. If you do not agree with the decision made by the Office of the Prosecutor General, a further appeal can be made to the preliminary investigation judge who approved the order. The decision of the preliminary investigation judge is final-
Articles 72, 228 – 231,
15 July 2013
16 July 2013
27 March 1996
8 December 2005
25 January 2011
8 March 2000