Viimasel paaril aastakümnendil kohaldatekse üha rohkematel töökohtadel videovalvet, seda nii avalikkusele ligipääsetavates ruumides, nagu näiteks poodides või restoranides kui ka piiratud ligipääsuga ruumides nagu haiglates või koolides.
Kaasuse kokkuvõte

Copland vs. Ühendkuningriigid

Euroopa Inimõiguste Kohus

The applicant Ms.Copland was an employee of a state college. The usage of her telephone (numbers dialled, dates, time and length of calls), e-mail (e-mail addresses, dates and time at which e-mails were sent) and Internet (websites visited, time and duration of visits) were monitored at her workplace in order to ascertain whether she was making an excessive use of college facilities for personal purposes. 

Ms.Copland complained that the monitoring of her communications and usage of internet at workplace violated her right to private life.

Court’s ruling
The Court ruled that as there was no law allowing employers to monitor telephone conversations, e-mails and usage of Internet by their employees, the monitoring of Ms.Copland’s activities violated her right to private life.

The Court noted that the applicant had reasonable expectations of privacy for her telephone, e-mail and internet usage at the workplace, as she was not warned that these activities could be monitored and had not give her consent to it.

Inimõiguste giid

Inimõiguste hariduse Euroopa platvorm